Trump is constantly in the negative spotlight, and his blunders from the past are starting to catch up with him. I personally can't wait to see his reign as the leader of the Unites States come to a crashing end.
What I can't figure out is the theatrics that happen before he or anyone gets elected, it's like watching children fighting on a playground.
If you plan to represent your country in the best possible way I want to hear about how you plan to do that, what skills do you have that will help achieve that goal. I want to hear backup plans, contingency plans, intelligent conversation.
We never hear that though, it always turns into a mud slinging match with each side digging up as much dirt in the other person and then leaking it to the press to make the other person look as bad as possible. The people then have to choose from the better worst candidate at the end.
I think that if all parties involved in trying to get elected, start this type of campaign, and there is no clear person that you would want to represent your country, there should be an option to remove each candidate and replace them with new ones. It would eventually eliminate the mud slinging and perhaps the new candidates would change their tactics.
The change is coming and it's starting an almost worst trend. Now politicians are staring to get elected based on a mass majority of people who want certain things, like weed to made legal, promises of a wall being built across the continent to keep out immigrants. How does any of this help the country? It sounds to me like it's going to be worse not better.
Sure pot is going to create jobs and build revenue, it's also going to kill a lot of people, it will be almost undetectable if you eat it in a brownie or something like it, then it takes about twenty minutes before you feel the effects of it. You could be driving before it hits you that you are stoned. But this is a topic for another day.
Scott Goerz
